Along those lines, one of the things too many white evangelicals do not understand is their - for lack of a better word - “Anglo-normative” behavior which really isolates large majorities of people of color. What do I mean? For example, look at this very article, and how you titled it. It ought to be very evident to everyone, even casual observers, that this ought to refer to “White Evangelicals”. Very clearly, no other community of evangelicals could be characterized as supporting Trump, and any other media outlet would denote this. The division along racial lines is so stark that, to omit the fact that white evangelicals are generally the ones grandstanding for Trump, especially given the fact that they are literally the ONLY cohort that is so supportive of Trump, is not only omissive, but exclusionary to evangelicals of color. Seems like to white evangelicals, it doesn’t matter that evangelicals of color soundly rejected Trump. It seems that all that matters is that white evangelicals generally supported Trump. With such an obvious division along racial lines, the only reason for such a glaring omission would be that white evangelicals see their own political behavior as the gold standard, the norm from which other evangelicals might deviate (or not). This might be unintentional on your part, but you need to understand that By excluding the viewpoints of such a large percentage of your fellow brothers and sisters in Christ, you normalize yourself and denormalize them. In other words, to put it very bluntly: your title of this very article is an insult to the vast majority of Christians of color, whose leaders are clearly not for Trump, but who you have (unwittingly) ignored in your article’s heading because you have normalized your community, and denormalized theirs. This is part of the reason why you really ought to get out of your bubble and invite these Christians of color on your show to educate you on these things.