Posted Jul 21, 2022 by Michael L. Brown

Because the Republican platforms over the years have been much closer to my values than the Democratic platforms, I have voted Republican for as long as I can remember. But when it comes to bringing about moral and cultural change in America, I do not look to a political party. Not a chance. There is moral compromise in both major parties, and the battle we are fighting for the soul of the nation is a spiritual battle long before it is a political battle. The recent House vote to codify same-sex “marriage” was yet another reminder for us.

As reported by Fox News on July 19, “A vote to codify same-sex marriage into federal law split House Republicans on Tuesday, with roughly a third of the GOP conference voting with Democrats in favor and the rest opposing.

“In a 267-157 vote, the House passed legislation repealing the Defense of Marriage Act and enshrining protections for gay marriage into federal law. Overall, 47 House Republicans voted with nearly every single Democrat to back the measure, dubbed the Respect for Marriage Act.”

Let that sink in for a moment.

It is bad enough that this bill is called the “Respect for Marriage Act,” seeing that the “marriage” of which it speaks represents a radical and fundamental redefining of the institution of marriage.

And it is to the shame of the Democratic Party that “nearly every single Democrat” voted in favor of the measure.

But it is no surprise that the Democrats voted this way, seeing that they are overtly and proudly pro-LGBTQ+. Perhaps the only surprise is that there were any who did not toe the line.

But for 47 Republicans to vote this way, representing almost 25 percent of all Republicans in the House, is both surprising and shameful.

That’s because the Republican Party is supposed to be the pro-life, pro-family party, the party that upholds traditional Judeo-Christian values. Why else do so many conservative Christians vote Republican if not for these core moral and social values?

The fact is that the redefining of marriage by the Supreme Court in 2015 represents one of the most radical social developments in our nation’s history, fundamentally changing the meaning and purpose of marriage.

In fact, the same Barack Obama who lit up the White House in rainbow colors to celebrate the 2015 ruling is the same person who said while campaigning in 2008 that, as a Christian, he believed marriage was the union of one man and one woman.

Not only so, but Proposition 8, which was on the ballot in 2008 in California and which upheld the historic definition of marriage, was passed with the help of the large turnout of African American voters. They voted for Barack Obama, but in keeping with their largely conservative family values, they voted for Proposition 8. In their mind, the man they were voting for shared their views.

That’s how dramatically and quickly the tide changed in our nation, from candidate Obama affirming male-female marriage to President Obama shifting his views already in his first term.

That’s part of the reason we find ourselves in the midst of such cultural madness today, where the very meaning of “woman” is hotly debated, where medical websites use acronyms such as AFAB and AMAB (meaning, assigned female at birth and assigned male at birth) rather than “female” and “male,” and where even the Merriam-Webster dictionary has expanded its definition of “female.”

The normalizing of same-sex “marriage” simply represented the proverbial camel’s nose entering the tent, to be followed by: 1) the amping up of radical trans activism in the schools, in the workplace, on TV and social media, and in sports; 2) the rise of drag queens, to the point that the American Library Association endorses drag queens reading stories to little children in libraries; 3) the increasing marginalization of those holding to conservative Christian values on both grass roots and legal levels.

In fact, if I provided links just to my relevant articles on these subjects over the last 7 years (since Obergefell), this entire page (literally) would be filled with “see here and here and here . . . .” The list is almost endless. (For the moment, if you want devastating proof of #3 in the list, above, go here.)

Really now, redefining marriage was not even on the radar for leading gay activists just a few decades ago, since under no circumstances was a cultural shift of this enormity even envisioned. Yet here we stand today, when 47 Republicans voted to codify this radical redefinition of our most fundamental social institution.

Again, as I have said many times, by saying this, I do not mean that gay couples do not love each other deeply. And I do not deny that many of them are incredibly devoted parents. I simply mean that marriage throughout history, with the rarest and slightest exceptions (like Nero marrying a man who took on female characteristics), has always been the union of a male and female. And from a biblical perspective, the idea of two men or two women marrying would be utterly abhorrent.

For 47 House Republicans to vote to protect this new version of “marriage” is deplorable (in the worst sense of the word), regardless of what Republican Senators decide to do.

And it is another reminder that, while I continue to prefer Republican policies to Democrat policies, by and large, I absolutely do not look to either party to be major agents of righteous moral and cultural change. That remains the calling of the Church and the role of the gospel.

As I argue in my forthcoming book, The Political Seduction of the Church, to confuse the role of politics with the role of the gospel is a fatal mistake. We cannot afford to make it again.

Tags: 

Sign Up or Login to post comments.

Comments

OT posted a comment · Jul 24, 2022
The battle belongs to the Lord. Sad to say the direction some have taken /is an apocalyptic willful stand against God and humanity. The willful teaching that sin is to be dabbled in, even embrace the lust of the flesh don’t fight it give into it. Why would the world mock the death and resurrection of Christ/the work of the cross. “I pray God have mercy!” “You, Lord, are forgiving and good, abounding in love to all who call to you.” (Psalm 86:5 NIV). “He saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of His mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit.” (Titus 3:5 NIV). My hope is found in you Lord…. OT!
user profile
Really now posted a comment · Jul 24, 2022
So ‘czarpaul’ - by saying that you are praying for god’s ‘RIGHTEOUS, DESTRUCTIVE AND DEVASTATING JUDGMENT’, does this mean that ‘divine’ violence is ok?? So one of the 2 great commandments is for US to love our enemies, but you are ‘praying and praying’ that God destroys ‘his’ enemies in a ‘DEVASTATING’ way?? I’m sooooo confused. So Which is it?? DEVASTATION? Or love? C’mon czar, can’t be both.
czarpaul posted a comment · Jul 23, 2022
And people wonder WHY I pray for God's RIGHTEOUS, DESTRUCTIVE AND DEVASTATING JUDGMENT!!! It is the ONLY thing that will wake up the church! Parts of the nation WILL remain and parts WILL survive and THOSE PARTS can have the revival so desperately wanted by the small remnant still faithful this side of judgment.
OT posted a comment · Jul 23, 2022
Jill Biden heckled at Connecticut ice cream shop: 'Your husband is the worst'
OT posted a comment · Jul 22, 2022
Correction narcissistic gain - for -narcotic gain.
OT posted a comment · Jul 22, 2022
Skwh310 where is your Selective outrage . Pelosi is as bad as trump! Using her position for narcotic gain! Above the law she’s unethical she should be sanctioned thrown in jail ! She won’t though will she ?
OT posted a comment · Jul 21, 2022
“Nancy Pelosi's husband buys millions in semiconductor stock before Senate votes on $52 billion in subsidies to tech industry.”
OT posted a comment · Jul 21, 2022
Your fake outrage is bologna!
OT posted a comment · Jul 21, 2022
Yes the horror’s Martha Stewart goes to prison for insider trading! And House speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband / inside track on computer stock ? What bunch of whoeee!
Swkh310 posted a comment · Jul 21, 2022
Our elected officials don’t always vote the way we hope? Shocking! Sometimes they have a different view of the law than ours? Horrors!
OT posted a comment · Jul 21, 2022
obama and his liberal ilk are responsible for the dark misguided social degradation a "a trail of human misery and degradation" our country is slipping into! For him to have lead the charge to redefine the definition of marriage the act of evil. obamas perverse legacy ! What a nightmare. And now biden will it ever end the perversity Skwh310 r/n all they care about is the right of who can do who! And who can kill what and when they like, Sad to say that is an apocalyptic willful stand against God and humanity.